Tag Archives: Conservative Forum for Hawaii

The Conservative Forum For Hawaii Doesn’t Get It

The Conservative Forum for Hawaii doesn’t get it. They believe Hawaii County should cut it’s budget to pay for infrastructure improvements instead of floating bonds or imposing impact fees. This isn’t a realistic way to address this issue. The county can only cut the budget so far before it affects essential services.

Impact fees would’ve helped to mitigate this problem. However, the county council failed to pass this legislation yet again. So, the taxpayers are responsible for paying for these improvements.

The island’s mounting infrastructure deficit needs to be addressed. However, the county has limited options, besides floating more bonds, to fix this problem. 11.3% of the Hawaii County budget is allocated for debt service, so the county’s debt will likely increase in the future as a result.

I bet the Conservative Forum for Hawaii never thought of the unintended consequences resulting from the rejection of this proposed legislation.

I strongly encourage all my loyal readers to express your frustration to the Conservative Forum for Hawaii whenever you are stuck in traffic or angry about the poor condition of our roadways.

Oceanic Time Warner Cable recently responded to the DCCA-CATV’s additional information requests concerning their open Hawaii County franchise renewal application.

The Hawaii PUC denied HECO’s Aina Koa Pono biofuel supply contract application on Thursday.

Related item: Hawaiian Electric disappointed by PUC’s biofuels ruling

The ongoing lawsuits involving the Hokuli’a project continue to proceed. I am absolutely
dumbfounded how much the discovery portion of this case may cost? The $800,000 to three million dollars cost is shockingly excessive.

Lastly, the restoration of the Kona Village Resort seems to be moving forward.


The Conservative Forum for Hawaii’s Opposition Against Impact Fees Likely Killed This Legislation

The Hawaii County Council rejected impact fee legislation yet again. The Conservative Forum for Hawaii‘s opposition likely swayed certain key council (e.g Angel Pilago and Dominic Yagong) members to vote against this proposal.

I criticized their position via e-mail, which I sent on Friday.

Aloha,

Your last e-mail regarding the proposed impact fees legislation didn’t make any sense. Cutting the county budget won’t pay for infrastructure improvements. For example, impact fees would’ve covered the cost of the La’aloa Avenue Extension. However, the county has to float bonds to pay for this roadway instead.

The Conservative Forum for Hawaii was strongly against the 56 million bond float, which funded this roadway project. So, your group’s positions don’t make any sense. Nevertheless, it is pretty clear the Conservative Forum for Hawaii wants the county to:

1. Continue the ineffective (and illegal) fair share system
2. Continue floating bonds for infrastructure projects.

The taxpayers of this county shouldn’t have to absorb the cost of mitigating impacts from these developments. Enacting an impact fee ordinance would’ve leveled the playing field.

Sincerely,

Aaron Stene

The Conservative Forum for Hawaii never directly responded to my e-mail. They only sent me a banner, which thanked the council members who voted against this legislation.

Update: A member of this group replied to my e-mail on Sunday expressing the group’s interest to discuss this issue with me. This same individual e-mailed me this rebuttal later on, which I posted below:

“Aloha Aaron,

I have no issue with your opinion whatsoever. The issue at hand, and the one addressed by the Conservative Forum, is not ‘fair share’. It is the continuing efforts by lawmakers to impinge on the rights of individuals by passing oppressive and odious ordinances and continuing to act, as they have done since statehood and before, to saddle individuals with ridiculous laws – which should not be their job – and to act in completely illegal ways. A prime example is the letting of contracts which are written so that only one of the bidders can qualify.

The County Council is our first line of government. They need to learn that the old ways, and by that I mean by way of favors and bribes, are not appropriate.

Hawaii is already the least user-friendly state for business in the entire country. It is rapidly becoming the least resident-friendly as well. That situation exists because our government pays no attention to referendum issues. You pointed out thecounty charter amendment requiring the county to use 2 percent of property tax revenues to buy land for public access or open space. We voted on that and the county ignored the vote.

The issue at hand is not that the Conservative Forum is in any way promoting any illegal system or suggesting that the county continue to float bonds for infrastructure projects. You suggestion that “It is pretty clear” that the CF ‘wants’ those things is erroneous and, in fact, a cheap shot not based in fact.

The Conservative Forum wants the Council to recognize who they represent and to represent the voters fairly. We intend to strongly disagree with any Council action which further burdens the voters of this county. If it happens that the burden is piggybacked to something that might be a good idea, and this particular measure was NOT a good idea, we shall oppose it for the simple reason that it does not do the ONE THING the Council is supposed to do: Make life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of the CITIZENS easier.

The local government on this state has been completely out of control since inception, as you must certainly agree. Our intent is not to keep re-electing people who have the same mind-set as the ‘business-as-usual’ gang. We intend to, and ARE, building a citizen coalition that makes a difference. And that difference has to begin by calling out the Council on their egregious actions and holding them to account.

We no longer have enough money in this county to support the hundreds of employees Billy Kenoi hired when he was the Executive Assistant to Harry Kim. We are not going to stand idly by while the voters are taxed and penalized for excesses which should never been allowed. Hiring companies owned by department heads immediately comes to mind, but so does almost everything else the county does. That needs to stop.

Passing resolutions which do more harm than good does not help. Making accusations about the Conservative Forum that are incorrect and uninformed at best and malicious at worst – especially since you make position statements that are not our position, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The problem is our local government, not the Conservative Forum. Your argument is erroneous. It misses the point entirely.”

 


Kona Commons Newest Tenants

Maryl Group Construction recently started construction on makai pad fronting the Target at Kona Commons. AT&T Wireless and a Bank of Hawaii branch is slated to anchor this building. The mauka pad is slated to be a McDonalds.

Road and Highway Builders has about a day of paving left (weather permitting) between m.m 11-m.m 19 on Saddle Road. The roadway striping and signage will be the remaining punch list items after the paving is complete.

This is the latest update regarding the Kiholo Bay lookout intersection widening project.

“Sandwich Isles work is basically completed. Grace Pacific and us should be starting back up after the Ironman. Work on Queen K was prohibited for three weeks prior to the Ironman.”

The Mamalahoa Highway resurfacing project (between Makalei and Palani Junction) is slated to go out to bid by mid-October. The FHWA recently obligated funds for this project after the HDOT submitted the required environmental documentation.

Lastly, WHT  recently published my letter to the editor regarding impact fees. The Conservative Forum for Hawaii‘s recent letter to the editor criticizing this funding mechanism was the impetus for this rebuttal.

I e-mailed the Conservative Forum for Hawaii after their letter was published. They believe the county should cut their budget to pay for these improvements instead of enacting an impact fee.


UH Professor Callies Astounding Insensitivity Towards Hawaiian Burials

UH Professor David Callies was one of the featured speakers at a recent Conservative Forum for Hawaii meeting. Hawaiian burial sites was one of the issues he discussed:

“On Hawaiian issues, he comments this is the “third rail” which prevents the usual meaningful discussion of laws and regulations among legislators. The issue of Hawaiian remains is one example. Presently, the State Burial Council only allows two possibilities if native Hawaiian remains are found on a property: remove them, or keep them in place. Ruling for remaining in place but not allowing them to be covered over and developed upon is frequently the result.

There needs to be another alternative. “I know myself of several cases of native Hawaiian remains on this island that are covered over with concrete”.”

Professor Callies made an astoundingly insensitive comment about Hawaiian burials . These sites should be preserved in place and not paved over. I know this poses problems for developers, etc. However, progress shouldn’t usurp the protection and preservation of these sites.

Professor Callies lassiez faire attitude towards burials perhaps explains another facet of  his speech:

“Currently, cases brought before the state supreme court by entities such as the Sierra Club, Life of the Land, Earth Justice, and Native Hawaiian groups were winning 90% of the time. These cases also involved reversal of lower court findings about 65-75% of the time. It was commented that if large developers with skilled attorneys and deep resources could not predict the land use laws effectively, with odds like that the only rational decision was not to play at all.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 465 other followers