The US Supreme Court denied the Coupes petition for writ of certiorari today. I’m very happy they decided to not to grant the Coupes petition. Judge Ronald Ibarra’s meticulously concise 2007 ruling should’ve addressed all the Coupes concerns. However, they decided to appeal it to the Hawaii Supreme Court in 2008 and 2010.
The Hawaii Supreme Court upheld Judge Ibarra’s ruling both times. The Coupes then petitioned the US Supreme Court to hear their case.
Robert Thomas, one of Mr. Coupe’s attorneys, expressed disappointment over the Court’s decision in a statement posted on his blog. Nevertheless, I wonder if Charles Coupe will comment on this decision. He submitted a letter to the editor in August, which detailed only one side of this litigation.
This decision puts Hokuli’a on the spot. Hokuli’a originally had 60 months to complete the Mamalahoa (Hokuli’a) bypass. Twenty months already have been expended, which left 40 months on the clock.
The clock stopped while the Kelly and Coupe cases were adjudicated. However, I believe it has restarted in light of yesterday’s US Supreme Court decision. Nevertheless, I don’t believe Hokuli’a or the bonding company have the financial wherewithal to complete the bypass within that time frame.
Related item: Bypass road protest dead-ends



